Scripts
Egyptian Hieroglyphs
ee-JIP-shun HY-ruh-glifs
Also Known As Medu Netjer
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin from 3200 BCE
Egyptian hieroglyphs were the formal writing system of ancient Egypt, first attested around 3200 to 3100 BCE and used for roughly 3,500 years on monuments, temples and religious texts. The system combined logograms for whole words, phonograms for sounds and determinatives that clarified meaning, so it functioned as a mixed logographic and phonetic script rather than a pure alphabet. Ancient Egyptians called it medu netjer, the god's words, and it gave rise to two cursive administrative derivatives, hieratic and demotic, before the Coptic alphabet eventually replaced it. Jean-Francois Champollion deciphered the script in the 1820s using the trilingual Rosetta Stone.
Facts
Script TypeReclassified under TaxonomyDecision 18: Egyptian hieroglyphs mix logograms with phonetic (syllabic-functioning) signs, the recognition of which (Champollion) was the decisive decipherment step; Gelb's classic classification and Daniels and Bright, The World's Writing Systems, 1996, both treat it as logosyllabic rather than purely logographic. DirectionalityFlexible: written in vertical columns top to bottom, or in horizontal rows from either left or right, with the orientation of human and animal figures marking the correct reading direction. 2 In Use Since (Year)Naqada III / Dynasty 0 period; the single earliest known instance is dated to roughly 3100 BCE at Abydos. How and why the script was invented is not well understood; the leading hypothesis traces it to prehistoric rock-picture traditions, but this is not settled. Learn More
Cracking the Code: Champollion and the Rosetta Stone
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
For over a thousand years after the last hieroglyphic inscription was carved, nobody could read Egypt's monuments. Renaissance scholars guessed that the signs were purely symbolic, mystical pictures rather than a working script, and that guess held the field back for centuries. The 1799 discovery of the Rosetta Stone, carrying the same royal decree in hieroglyphic, demotic and Greek, gave scholars a way in, but progress was slow: knowing what the text said in Greek did not by itself explain how the hieroglyphic signs worked. Jean-Francois Champollion spent years comparing royal names, which were conveniently ringed in an oval cartouche, across multiple bilingual inscriptions, and worked out that many hieroglyphic signs were genuinely phonetic, standing for sounds, not only for ideas. He announced the decipherment in 1822 and published his grammar of the system in the years that followed, finally showing that hieroglyphic writing was not primarily symbolic at all. Champollion later founded the Egyptian Antiquities department at the Louvre, and the trilingual stone that made his work possible remains one of the most visited objects in the British Museum today.
From Sacred Carving to Everyday Hand: Hieratic, Demotic and the Coptic Alphabet
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Formal hieroglyphs were built for permanence: carved or painted onto temple walls and tomb chambers, each sign a small, detailed picture, meant to be read as much as admired. That level of detail was never practical for everyday paperwork, so almost as soon as hieroglyphic writing existed, a faster cursive version called hieratic developed alongside it, used by priests and officials for religious and administrative texts written with reed pen on papyrus. Centuries later, hieratic itself gave way to an even more abbreviated, non-pictorial script called demotic, first appearing around the seventh century BCE and used for ordinary contracts, letters and records, so unlike its parent hieroglyphs that it reads more like a script of its own than a shorthand. Egyptian writing changed one more time before hieroglyphs disappeared entirely: the Coptic alphabet, built mostly from Greek letters with a handful of demotic signs added for sounds Greek did not have, became the way Egyptian was written once Christianity spread through the Nile valley. Coptic outlived hieroglyphs, hieratic and demotic combined, and is still used liturgically by the Coptic Orthodox Church today.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Deciphered Egyptian hieroglyphic writing, announced 1822.
Influenced
By way of Demotic Egyptian, the latest cursive stage of hieroglyphic writing, whose signs supplement the borrowed Greek letters for sounds Greek did not have.
Held Differently
Phoenician Script, Scripts Why this is disputed. The Proto-Sinaitic script that underlies Phoenician is widely, though not universally, held to have borrowed its letter shapes from Egyptian hieratic signs via acrophony, a case built mainly by William Albright from the 1950s on top of Alan Gardiner's earlier identification of the inscriptions as Semitic. Earlier 19th and 20th century scholars proposed alternative derivations from cuneiform, Cretan Linear or Cypriot syllabic scripts instead.
Cuneiform, Scripts Why this is disputed. Linguist Geoffrey Sampson has argued Egyptian hieroglyphs appeared shortly after cuneiform and were probably invented under its influence. Most specialists instead hold Egyptian and Mesopotamian writing arose independently, pointing to hieroglyphs' strong phonetic component from the start as evidence against a common source; the question is unresolved.
Script Of
In the Other Atlases
Sources
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Influenced By: Cuneiform
Sampson has argued Egyptian hieroglyphs appeared shortly after Sumerian cuneiform and were probably invented under its influence. Most Egyptologists instead hold that Egyptian and Mesopotamian writing arose independently, pointing to hieroglyphs' strong phonetic component from the start as evidence against a shared source; the question remains unresolved.
A dissenting reading, from Geoffrey SampsonWorld History Encyclopedia, World History Encyclopedia (formerly Ancient History Encyclopedia)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.