The Khasi-Palaungic languages are a primary branch of the Austroasiatic family of Southeast Asia, spoken across the Indo-Burman Ranges and mainland Indochina, under the classification proposed by Paul Sidwell in 2011 and revised in 2018. The branch splits into two main groups: Khasic, comprising War, Lyngngam, Khasi and Pnar, and Palaungic, comprising Palaung, Riang, Blang and Wa among others. This grouping departs from earlier work by Gerard Diffloth, who in 2005 classified Khasi together with the Khmuic and Mangic languages as a single unit; Sidwell's framework instead treats Khmuic and Mangic as separate Austroasiatic branches in their own right.
Facts
RegionThe Indo-Burman Ranges and mainland Indochina 1 Connections
Open Questions
Source Wikipedia: Khasi-Palaungic Languages
Source Wikipedia: Khasi-Palaungic Languages
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Khasi-Palaungic Languages
Wikimedia FoundationInfobox, geographic distribution fieldQuote, Infobox, geographic distribution field
Indo-Burman Ranges, Indochina
View the Source Open Questions (2 open questions)
How many speakers do the Khasi-Palaungic languages total today?
The main English-language reference consulted for this branch names no aggregate speaker-population estimate for the Khasi-Palaungic branch as a whole.
What would resolve this A specialist source (Sidwell 2011/2018 or a dedicated Austroasiatic comparative study) giving an aggregate speaker count across the branch's Khasic and Palaungic groups.
sociolinguisticsWikipedia: Khasi-Palaungic Languages
Has a Proto-Khasi-Palaungic proto-language been securely reconstructed?
The main English-language reference consulted for this branch names no developed proto-language reconstruction, only listing Khasic and Palaungic as its two constituent groups.
What would resolve this A specialist source (Sidwell 2011/2018 or a dedicated Austroasiatic comparative study) giving the state of Proto-Khasi-Palaungic reconstruction.
historical linguisticsWikipedia: Khasi-Palaungic Languages
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.