This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Linear A is not a mystery for lack of material. Archaeologists have recovered clay tablets, seals and inscribed objects bearing the script from sites across Bronze Age Crete, enough that its roughly ninety signs and their rough sound values can be estimated with some confidence. The mystery is what those sounds spell. Because Linear A was later adapted, with new phonetic values, into Linear B, which does record an identifiable language, Mycenaean Greek, scholars have tried reading Linear A backward through Linear B's known sign values. The results do not resolve into any known language, ancient or otherwise, and the underlying tongue, conventionally called Minoan, remains unclassified. That has not stopped proposals: Leonard Palmer suggested a Luwian or other Anatolian language in 1958, a theory that has lost support over time; Cyrus Gordon argued in the 1960s for a Semitic identification, pointing to resemblances with Akkadian and Canaanite that most specialists consider too thin to be conclusive; other scholars have floated Etruscan or Hurrian connections. None has won broad acceptance. Linear A remains a genuinely open case in the field, not a puzzle waiting for one more clever idea so much as a script whose underlying language may simply have left no other trace for comparison.