Language Atlas

How Languages Connect
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Linguist

Charles F. Hockett

Structural and Theoretical Linguistics

Charles Francis Hockett was an American linguist who developed many influential ideas in American structuralist linguistics, representing the post-Bloomfieldian phase often called distributionalism or taxonomic structuralism. His academic career spanned over half a century at Cornell and Rice universities, and he held that linguistics was properly a branch of anthropology, making contributions significant to that field as well.

Facts
Birth Year
1916 1
Death Year
2000 1
Role
American linguist, developed influential ideas in American structuralist linguistics 1
Birth Date
1916-01-17 1
Death Date
2000-11-03 1
Classification
Nationality
United States 1
Charles F. Hockett
Filter Results1 entry
Connections

Associated With

His early fieldwork and dissertation research on Potawatomi, an Algonquian language, grounded the structuralist methods he later generalized in his design-features theory of language.

Influenced By

Hockett structuralist linguistics carried forward and systematized Bloomfield distributional method, representing the post-Bloomfieldian phase of American structuralism.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Charles F. Hockett
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead sentence, birth date in parenthetical
    January 17, 1916, November 3, 2000
  • Lead sentence, birth year in parenthetical
    January 17, 1916, November 3, 2000
  • Lead sentence, occupational description
    was an American linguist who developed many influential ideas in American structuralist linguistics.
  • Lead sentence, death date in parenthetical
    January 17, 1916, November 3, 2000
  • Lead sentence, death year in parenthetical
    January 17, 1916, November 3, 2000
  • Nationality, Charles F. Hockett entity page
    Charles Francis Hockett was an American linguist who developed many influential ideas in American structuralist linguistics, representing the post-Bloomfieldian phase often called distributionalism or taxonomic structuralism.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.