Chukotko-Kamchatkan is a small family of languages indigenous to the far northeastern Siberian region of Russia, comprising the Chukotkan branch, including Chukchi and Koryak, and the now-extinct Kamchatkan branch, including Itelmen. Its languages are spoken by only a few thousand people combined, most of them elderly, and all are considered endangered.
Facts
RegionExtreme northeastern Siberia 2 Speaker Count Proto-Language StatusReconstructed as Proto-Chukotko-Kamchatkan, per Michael Fortescue's Comparative Dictionary of Chukotko-Kamchatkan (2005) 3 Browse and compare
Classification Confidence Reconstructed Ancestor Compare
Number of Languages In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source Wikipedia: Chukotko-Kamchatkan LanguagesLead sentence 1tier 2Quote, Lead sentence 1
The Chukotko-Kamchatkan or Chukchi–Kamchatkan languages are a language family of extreme northeastern Siberia.
Sources
1. Glottolog: Chukotko-Kamchatkan (languoid record)
GlottologLanguoid record: child_language_count
"child_language_count": 7
Languoid record: level and category
"level": "family", "bookkeeping": false, "category": "Family"
View the Source 2. Wikipedia: Chukotko-Kamchatkan Languages
WikipediaLead section, paragraph 1: family location sentence
The Chukotko-Kamchatkan or Chukchi-Kamchatkan languages are a language family of extreme northeastern Siberia.
Lead section, paragraph 1: Chukotkan branch speaker count sentence
The Chukotkan branch had close to 7,000 speakers left (as of 2010, the majority being speakers of Chukchi), with a reported total ethnic population of 25,000.
Infobox: protoname
Proto-Chukotko-Kamchatkan
View the Source 3. Wikipedia: Proto-Chukotko-Kamchatkan Language
WikipediaLead section, paragraph 1: reconstruction statementQuote, Lead section, paragraph 1: reconstruction statement
Proto-Chukotko-Kamchatkan is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Chukotko-Kamchatkan languages.
View the Source Wikidata: Chukotko-Kamchatkan
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.